Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754647Ab3IMTdj (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:33:39 -0400 Received: from dkim2.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.54]:51726 "EHLO dkim2.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753187Ab3IMTdh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:33:37 -0400 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1379100816-0421b502203b75a0001-xx1T2L X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: clmason@fusionio.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT To: Mark Fasheh From: Chris Mason In-Reply-To: <20130913175801.GL31381@wotan.suse.de> CC: Guenter Roeck , Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-btrfs , Zach Brown References: <20130913133314.GA20461@roeck-us.net> <20130913163535.GA5681@roeck-us.net> <20130913170022.18785.82013@localhost.localdomain> <20130913175801.GL31381@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: <20130913193334.18785.8623@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: alot/0.3.4 Subject: Re: Build failures due to commit 416161db (btrfs: offline dedupe) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:33:34 -0400 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Build failures due to commit 416161db (btrfs: offline dedupe) X-Originating-IP: [10.101.1.160] X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.101.1.41] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1379100816 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.101.1.181:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.140580 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 840 Lines: 21 Quoting Mark Fasheh (2013-09-13 13:58:01) > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:00:22PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > Quoting Guenter Roeck (2013-09-13 12:35:35) > > I'm happy to fix this with a bigger put of the info struct, just > > let me know the preferred arch-happy solution. > > In fact old versions of the patch were putting the whole struct but during > review I was asked to change it. This should be very straight forward to fix > so long as we all stay calm ;) > --Mark Mark, could you please send a patch for the whole-struct option until the unaligned put is upstreamed? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/