Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 04:53:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 04:52:55 -0500 Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.53]:50400 "EHLO smtpde02.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 04:52:50 -0500 To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20010123205315.A4662@werewolf.able.es> <95csna$vb6$1@cesium.transmeta.com> From: Christoph Rohland In-Reply-To: <95csna$vb6$1@cesium.transmeta.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) Date: 02 Feb 2001 10:57:55 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "H. Peter Anvin" writes: > What happened with this being a management tool for shared memory > segments?! Unfortunately we lost this ability in the 2.4.0-test series. SYSV shm now works only on an internal mounted instance and does not link the directory entry to the deleted state of the segment. IMNSHO the new implementation is so much cleaner that it was worth it. Probably we should fix ipcrm to be more flexible. Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/