Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:17:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:17:24 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:33031 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:17:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:23:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: "Eric W. Biederman" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suparna Bhattacharya , Petr Vandrovec , fastboot@osdl.org, Werner Almesberger Subject: Re: kexec for 2.5.44 (Who do I send this to?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1139 Lines: 29 On 19 Oct 2002, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > The kexec code has gone through a fairly decent review, and all known bugs > are resolved. There are still BIOS's that don't work after you have > run a kernel but that is an entirely different problem. > > My real question: With Linus off on vacation my real question is who > should I send this to? I believe Linus explicitly said he wasn't going to tell anyone, which means we're back to the days of "through it on the list over and over until someone admits to seeing it." Or send it to everyone who might be willing to push it to Linus when he gets back. By not accepting stuff at this point I would guess that the defacto freeze is here. Hope I'm wrong, there is some good stuff which would be ready by Oct 31. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/