Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265731AbSJTBwI>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:52:08 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265732AbSJTBwI>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:52:08 -0400
Received: from 2-136.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.136]:27608 "EHLO
	2-136.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S265731AbSJTBwH>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:52:07 -0400
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:58:09 -0200 (BRST)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com
To: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@netscape.net>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.44 - and offline for a week
In-Reply-To: <aorjq3$3dm$1@main.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0210192357430.22993-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org
X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 698
Lines: 18

On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:

> Perhaps this is good reason to delay the freeze for an additional 2
> weeks or so?  I fail to see the necessity of rushing into a freeze,

We're not rushing into a freeze.  This date was agreed upon months ago.

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/