Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265734AbSJTCEC>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:04:02 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265737AbSJTCEC>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:04:02 -0400
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:60172 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S265734AbSJTCEB>;
	Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:04:01 -0400
Message-ID: <3DB21088.9090003@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:10:16 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 3.0.4
References: <200210191112.g9JBCFl288460@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 461
Lines: 13

Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> The procps-2.x.x code silently gives bad output; it does NOT work.


Can you be more specific?  What bugs do you see?

I am wondering if Red Hat should integrate your procps if this is so?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/