From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: old trees
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:36:12 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201309171736.12482.arnd@arndb.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 587
Lines: 14

On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> asm-generic     9 months ago

I occasionally use this tree, but in most releases all asm-generic patches tend to
go along with whatever patch series needs them, since asm-generic changes are
typically done whenever we add some code to the kernel elsewhere. Please keep this
one.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/