Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:03:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:03:26 -0400 Received: from c-24-118-232-93.mn.client2.attbi.com ([24.118.232.93]:61831 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:03:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:08:36 -0500 (CDT) From: "Scott M. Hoffman" Reply-To: scott781@attbi.com To: Jeff Garzik cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <3DB21088.9090003@pobox.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 886 Lines: 33 On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > > The procps-2.x.x code silently gives bad output; it does NOT work. > > > Can you be more specific? What bugs do you see? > > I am wondering if Red Hat should integrate your procps if this is so? Hi, Under RedHat 8, when two cpu intensive processes are running at nice 19 on my smp system, top will report both 100% cpu for both user and nice. The same is true for 7.3. With procps-3.0.4 this seems to be fixed. Although the 'hide threads' code seems to be missing, or at least not working. It would be nice to have both. Just my $.02 USD, Scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/