Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754309Ab3IRAQD (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:16:03 -0400 Received: from mail.linux-iscsi.org ([67.23.28.174]:39071 "EHLO linux-iscsi.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752890Ab3IRAQB (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:16:01 -0400 Message-ID: <1379463821.32763.601.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Subject: Re: linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3.12-rc1) From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:23:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20130917155057.2125aa5f69fb9cf9bbe01166@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20130917155057.2125aa5f69fb9cf9bbe01166@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2329 Lines: 71 Hi Stephen, On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 15:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:08:11 -0400 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > So it's been two weeks, and the merge window for 3.12 is now closed. > > As usual, the executive friendly graph is at > http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-) > > (No merge commits counted, next-20130903 was the linux-next based on v3.11) > > Commits in v3.12-rc1 (relative to v3.11): 9474 (v3.11-rc11: 9494) > Commits in next-20130903: 8891 (next-20130701: 8929) > Commits with the same SHA1: 7991 ( 7670) > Commits with the same patch_id: 472 (1) ( 759) > Commits with the same subject line: 70 (1) ( 55) > > (1) not counting those in the lines above. > > So commits in -rc1 that were "in" next-20130903: 8533 90.1% (8484 89.4%) > Commits in -rc1 that were not in next-20120722: 941 9.9% (1010 10.6% > > So better than last time, but it would be still nice to figure out where > the last lot came from. I have the "git log --oneline --no-walk" list if > someone wants them. > > Some breakdown of that list: > > Top ten first word of commit summary: > > 57 net > 53 mips > 49 drm > 47 [scsi] > 23 perf > 23 nfs > 20 cifs > 19 nvme > 18 vfs > 17 arm > > Top ten authors: > > 33 Al Viro > 21 Sachin Kamat > 20 Linus Torvalds > 18 James Smart > 17 Jon Mason > 17 Chuck Lever > 16 Tomasz Figa > 16 Jingoo Han > 15 Daniel Borkmann > 14 Trond Myklebust > I'm totally confused by these stats.. The target-pending/for-next pull had ~30 commits with the term 'target' in the first word of the commit summary, and yours truly had 40 commits merged. Is there a reason why these would not be showing up in the above..? --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/