Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 04:54:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 04:54:42 -0400 Received: from vitelus.com ([64.81.243.207]:34319 "EHLO vitelus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 04:54:41 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:00:15 -0700 From: Aaron Lehmann To: Mark Mielke Cc: Zac Hansen , Nicholas Wourms , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new Message-ID: <20021020090015.GE25042@vitelus.com> References: <20021020084056.GD5064@mark.mielke.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021020084056.GD5064@mark.mielke.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 605 Lines: 14 On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 04:40:56AM -0400, Mark Mielke wrote: > Ask Richard if GCC was ever initially bootstrapped using a non-GPL > compiler suite. Ah, but that's the point! The bitkeeper license won't allow you to bootstrap a competing project using bitkeeper. If the same clauses existed in the licenses of these commercial compilers, we wouldn't have GCC. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/