Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752220Ab3IRQLN (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:11:13 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0215.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.215]:34582 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751537Ab3IRQLM (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:11:12 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1535:1544:1593:1594:1605:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:4117:4250:4321:5007:6119:6120:7652:7875:7903:904 X-HE-Tag: cord26_610f1e59d4c4f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6362 Message-ID: <1379520665.1787.40.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fpga: Introduce new fpga subsystem From: Joe Perches To: Michal Simek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, Alan Tull , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dinh Nguyen , Philip Balister , Alessandro Rubini , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Andrew Morton , Cesar Eduardo Barros , "David S. Miller" , Stephen Warren , Arnd Bergmann , David Brown , Dom Cobley Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5004 Lines: 172 On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 17:56 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > This new subsystem should unify all fpga drivers which > do the same things. Load configuration data to fpga > or another programmable logic through common interface. > It doesn't matter if it is MMIO device, gpio bitbanging, > etc. connection. The point is to have the same > inteface for these drivers. Is this really a "driver". Perhaps it's more of a core kernel function and belongs in kernel. > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c The error messages are a little shouty with all the unnecessary "!" uses. [] > +/** > + * fpga_mgr_read - Read data from fpga > + * @mgr: Pointer to the fpga manager structure > + * @buf: Pointer to the buffer location > + * @count: Pointer to the number of copied bytes > + * > + * Function reads fpga bitstream and copy them to output buffer. > + * > + * Returns the number of bytes copied to @buf, a negative error number otherwise > + */ > +static int fpga_mgr_read(struct fpga_manager *mgr, char *buf, ssize_t *count) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + if (test_and_set_bit_lock(FPGA_MGR_DEV_BUSY, &mgr->flags)) > + return -EBUSY; > + > + if (!mgr->mops || !mgr->mops->read) { > + dev_err(mgr->dev, > + "Controller doesn't support read operations!\n"); > + return -EPERM; > + } > + > + if (mgr->mops->read_init) { > + ret = mgr->mops->read_init(mgr); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(mgr->dev, "Failed in read-init!\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + } > + > + if (mgr->mops->read) { > + ret = mgr->mops->read(mgr, buf, count); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(mgr->dev, "Failed to read firmware!\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + } > + > + if (mgr->mops->read_complete) { > + ret = mgr->mops->read_complete(mgr); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(mgr->dev, "Failed in read-complete!\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + } > + > + clear_bit_unlock(FPGA_MGR_DEV_BUSY, &mgr->flags); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * fpga_mgr_attr_read - Read data from fpga > + * @dev: Pointer to the device structure > + * @attr: Pointer to the device attribute structure > + * @buf: Pointer to the buffer location > + * > + * Function reads fpga bitstream and copy them to output buffer > + * > + * Returns the number of bytes copied to @buf, a negative error number otherwise > + */ > +static ssize_t fpga_mgr_attr_read(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + struct fpga_manager *mgr = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + ssize_t count; > + int ret; > + > + if (mgr && mgr->fpga_read) > + ret = mgr->fpga_read(mgr, buf, &count); > + > + return ret == 0 ? count : -EPERM; EPERM isn't the only error return from fpga_read. > +} > + > +/** > + * fpga_mgr_write - Write data to fpga > + * @mgr: Pointer to the fpga manager structure > + * @fw_name: Pointer to the buffer location with bistream firmware filename > + * > + * @buf contains firmware filename which is loading through firmware > + * interface and passed to the fpga driver. > + * > + * Returns string lenght added to @fw_name, a negative error number otherwise > + */ > +static int fpga_mgr_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, const char *fw_name) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + const struct firmware *fw; > + > + if (!fw_name || !strlen(fw_name)) { > + dev_err(mgr->dev, "Firmware name is not specified!\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (!mgr->mops || !mgr->mops->write) { > + dev_err(mgr->dev, > + "Controller doesn't support write operations!\n"); > + return -EPERM; I think you should revisit the return codes. > +/** > + * fpga_mgr_attr_write - Write data to fpga > + * @dev: Pointer to the device structure > + * @attr: Pointer to the device attribute structure > + * @buf: Pointer to the buffer location with bistream firmware filename > + * @count: Number of characters in @buf > + * > + * @buf contains firmware filename which is loading through firmware > + * interface and passed to the fpga driver. > + * > + * Returns string lenght added to @buf, a negative error number otherwise > + */ > +static ssize_t fpga_mgr_attr_write(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, > + const char *buf, size_t count) > +{ > + struct fpga_manager *mgr = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + int ret; > + > + if (mgr && mgr->fpga_write) > + ret = mgr->fpga_write(mgr, buf); > + > + return ret == 0 ? strlen(buf) : -EPERM; > +} Same -EPERM issue as read > + mgr = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mgr), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mgr) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to alloc mgr struct!\n"); Unnecessary OOM message as there's a general dump_stack() already done on any OOM without GFP_NOWARN > diff --git a/include/linux/fpga.h b/include/linux/fpga.h [] > +struct fpga_manager { > + char name[48]; Maybe a #define instead of 48? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/