Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753568Ab3IRUpr (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:45:47 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:60942 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752173Ab3IRUpq (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:45:46 -0400 Message-ID: <523A10F5.7090009@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:45:41 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Hesselbarth CC: Jason Cooper , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Olof Johansson , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] ARM: provide common arch init for DT clocks References: <1379526839-14798-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20130918194711.GR19937@titan.lakedaemon.net> <523A046E.6040804@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <523A046E.6040804@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1291 Lines: 29 On 09/18/2013 01:52 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 09/18/2013 09:47 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> ... >>> Sebastian Hesselbarth (26): >>> ARM: nomadik: move mtu setup to clocksource init ... >> >> How would you like to handle this series? > > Jason, > > honestly I don't really know, yet. I was hoping for Arnd and Olof > decide on that. Maybe they also create a topic branch up to where > arch-wide of_clk_init is introduced. Then each removal patch can > go through the independent sub-trees. There may be more machs > introduced before, that can then also depend on the common branch. Oh, I was assuming you'd just take the whole thing through one tree, likely in arm-soc. That's why I created the topic branch for the Tegra PMIC patch that's a dependency of this... However, I guess if you just merge the core into a topic branch in arm-soc and everyone merges it back, that's fine. I assume the Tegra topic branch I created won't be necessary in that case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/