Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 06:01:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 06:01:52 -0400 Received: from node-d-1ef6.a2000.nl ([62.195.30.246]:18926 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 06:01:51 -0400 Subject: [LARGE patch 23/124] sets sent over and over again Re: [PATCH] ext2/3 updates for 2.5.44 (1/11): Default mount options in superblock From: Arjan van de Ven To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qJcFxju/gOyP6L/biJ1y" X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 20 Oct 2002 12:09:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1035108575.3130.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2137 Lines: 57 --=-qJcFxju/gOyP6L/biJ1y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I know everybody wants to be cool and split their patchkit up. I'm all for that. But why oh why do these sets have to be sent to LKML every time when a new upstream kernel is released and the only change is a rsync? (and Ted, this is not meant as a personal assault of any kind, your mail was just the one that was the final drop in the bucket) I hereby politely ask EVERYONE who wants to (re)posts large patchsets, to at minimum try to follow something like the following politeness guidelines 1) Make it ONE thread. Do this by cc or bcc'ing yourself on the mails and use the reply feature of your mailer to reply each next number of the set to the previous one. This allows people that use mail/news readers that can do threading to properly sort it. This is not hard, and I consider it the least you can do for the people that read lklm. 2) Do not resent all 506 parts of your patchkit every time Linus releases a new kernel and all you did was merge up. Post 1 mail with the fact that you did this and an URL to the patchkit if you feel everyone and their dog really wants to know this fact. This does not mean that if you did significant cleanup work you shouldn't repost (while keeping #1 in mind), that obviously is of more interest. =20 On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 11:35, tytso@mit.edu wrote: >=20 > This is the latest set of ext2/3 update patches, against 2.5.44. The > patches include: --=-qJcFxju/gOyP6L/biJ1y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9soDfxULwo51rQBIRAnL+AJ9Ugj/ipF4gqjTnDRJVPepaeXPFDACdGt3I zWuUZs2VjsF+YSesZ7mnP/s= =Brr5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qJcFxju/gOyP6L/biJ1y-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/