Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 10:25:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 10:25:20 -0400 Received: from 2-136.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.136]:60137 "EHLO 2-136.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 10:25:18 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:31:07 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Con Kolivas cc: Jim Houston , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Pathological case identified from contest In-Reply-To: <200210201733.44683.conman@kolivas.net> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 810 Lines: 21 On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Con Kolivas wrote: > The rest of the results were otherwise similar. It seems your patch > served to disadvantage kernel compilation in preference for more of the > background load. Probably a priority inheritance thing between parent and child processes, this should be easily fixable to be fairer (if it isn't already fairest with Jim's patch). Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/