Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752551Ab3ISQiC (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:38:02 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:33968 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751157Ab3ISQiA (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:38:00 -0400 Message-ID: <523B2867.7000209@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:37:59 -0500 From: Nathan Zimmer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Baron CC: , , Al Viro Subject: Re: [RFC] eventpoll: Move a kmem_cache_alloc and kmem_cache_free References: <1379087642-131349-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> <5239FA69.8030202@akamai.com> In-Reply-To: <5239FA69.8030202@akamai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [128.162.233.140] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1588 Lines: 36 On 09/18/2013 02:09 PM, Jason Baron wrote: > On 09/13/2013 11:54 AM, Nathan Zimmer wrote: >> We noticed some scaling issue in the SPECjbb benchmark. Running perf >> we found that the it was spending lots of time in SYS_epoll_ctl. >> In particular it is holding the epmutex. >> This patch helps by moving out the kmem_cache_alloc and kmem_cache_free out >> from under the lock. It improves throughput by around 15% on 16 sockets. >> >> While this patch should be fine as it is there are probably is more things >> that can be done out side the lock, like wakeup_source_unregister, but I am >> not familar with the area and I don't know of many tests. I did find the >> one posted by Jason Baron at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. >> >> Any thoughts? >> > Hi, > > Intersting - I think its also possible to completely drop taking the > 'epmutex' for EPOLL_CTL_DEL by using rcu, and restricting it on add > to more 'complex' topologies. That is when we have an epoll descriptor > that doesn't nest with other epoll descriptors, we don't need the > global 'epmutex' either. Any chance you can re-run with this? Its a bit > hacky, but we can clean it up if it makes sense. > > Thanks, > > -Jason > That is working GREAT. It is scaling to 16 jobs quite well. I will have to grab a larger machine( to see what the new scaling curve will be. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/