Message-ID: <1379647499.2145.24.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] perf lock: misc fixes and enhancements
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>,
        Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 20:24:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20130919190038.GJ3891@infradead.org>
References: <1378693159-8747-1-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com>
	 <20130919190038.GJ3891@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 994
Lines: 25

On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 16:00 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 07:19:12PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> > This patchset is a first in a series of perf-lock enhancements I am working
> > on. Overall it is pretty straightforward, dealing with cleanups, and some
> > cosmetic changes.
> > 
> > Patches 1-3 deal with some minor fixes and cleanups.
> > 
> > Patch 4 fixes a segfault in the report command when the perf.data
> > file is generated by a non perf-lock command.
> > 
> > Patch 5 and 6 are cosmetic changes.
> 
> Applied all but patch 5, since Mitake-san had concerns about it, lemme
> know if that changed.
> 

Thanks Arnaldo! By the way, we probably want patch 4 in stable, since it
does fix a day 1 bug.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/