Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932135Ab3ITUbr (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:31:47 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36803 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932121Ab3ITUbp (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:31:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:32:22 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, ohering@suse.com, jbottomley@parallels.com, hch@infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Drivers: scsi: FLUSH timeout Message-ID: <20130920203222.GA14306@kroah.com> References: <1379705547-15028-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1379705547-15028-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 651 Lines: 17 On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:32:27PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > The SD_FLUSH_TIMEOUT value is currently hardcoded. Hardcoded where? Please, more context. > On our cloud, we sometimes hit this timeout. I was wondering if we > could make this a module parameter. If this is acceptable, I can send > you a patch for this. A module parameter don't make sense for a per-device value, does it? greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/