Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:47:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:47:34 -0400 Received: from windlord.Stanford.EDU ([171.64.13.23]:39811 "HELO windlord.stanford.edu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:47:33 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new References: In-Reply-To: (Jeff Garzik's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2002 17:46:25 GMT") From: Russ Allbery Organization: The Eyrie Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:53:32 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter, sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 974 Lines: 17 Jeff Garzik writes: > If you keep a copy locally, sure. But the upstream sources, i.e. what's > important, you lose rights to even though you may have contributed > substantial amounts of code. IOW if binutils goes off in a direction > you don't like, for example the FSF changes the license from GPL to > Microsoft EULA, you don't have any say in the matter whatsoever. You're > left with a code fork based on the last GPL sources and/or the patches > you've kept locally. Jeff, have you read an FSF copyright assignment? It doesn't just say "I give you all rights to my work so that you can do whatever you want with it." -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/