Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752841Ab3IVSpQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 14:45:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:64801 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752620Ab3IVSou (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 14:44:50 -0400 From: Peter Senna Tschudin To: marcel@holtmann.org Cc: gustavo@padovan.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Peter Senna Tschudin Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Bluetooth: Fix assignment of 0/1 to bool variables Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 20:44:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1379875453-20083-2-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1379875453-20083-1-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> References: <1379875453-20083-1-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3006 Lines: 104 Convert 0 to false and 1 to true when assigning values to bool variables. Inspired by commit 3db1cd5c05f35fb43eb134df6f321de4e63141f2. The simplified semantic patch that find this problem is as follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/): @@ bool b; @@ ( -b = 0 +b = false | -b = 1 +b = true ) Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin --- net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff -u -p a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c @@ -5797,7 +5797,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_recv(struct l2 struct sk_buff *skb, u8 event) { int err = 0; - bool skb_in_use = 0; + bool skb_in_use = false; BT_DBG("chan %p, control %p, skb %p, event %d", chan, control, skb, event); @@ -5818,7 +5818,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_recv(struct l2 control->txseq); chan->buffer_seq = chan->expected_tx_seq; - skb_in_use = 1; + skb_in_use = true; err = l2cap_reassemble_sdu(chan, skb, control); if (err) @@ -5854,7 +5854,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_recv(struct l2 * current frame is stored for later use. */ skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb); - skb_in_use = 1; + skb_in_use = true; BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb, skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q)); @@ -5932,7 +5932,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru { int err = 0; u16 txseq = control->txseq; - bool skb_in_use = 0; + bool skb_in_use = false; BT_DBG("chan %p, control %p, skb %p, event %d", chan, control, skb, event); @@ -5944,7 +5944,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru /* Keep frame for reassembly later */ l2cap_pass_to_tx(chan, control); skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb); - skb_in_use = 1; + skb_in_use = true; BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb, skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q)); @@ -5955,7 +5955,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru l2cap_pass_to_tx(chan, control); skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb); - skb_in_use = 1; + skb_in_use = true; BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb, skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q)); @@ -5970,7 +5970,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru * the missing frames. */ skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb); - skb_in_use = 1; + skb_in_use = true; BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb, skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q)); @@ -5984,7 +5984,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru * SREJ'd frames. */ skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb); - skb_in_use = 1; + skb_in_use = true; BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb, skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q)); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/