Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 18:58:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 18:58:43 -0400 Received: from watchdog.cdt.org ([206.112.85.61]:60865 "EHLO mail.cdt.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 18:58:04 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:04:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Berlin To: Ben Collins Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new In-Reply-To: <20021020225928.GN696@phunnypharm.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1259 Lines: 35 On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:52:58PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > On Sunday, October 20, 2002, at 05:51 PM, Robert Love wrote: > > > > >On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 17:42, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > > > > >>You're plain wrong. > > >> > > >>You both have the copyright on your work. > > > > > >It is called copyright _assignment_ for a reason. How the hell are two > > >people supposed to simultaneously own a copyright on the same work? > > > > > Joint authorship. > > "The authors of a joint work are co-owners of copyright in the work" > > (17 USC ?201(a)). > > IOW They each own a 100% copyright in the work. > > Leads to odd situations of course, since one author can do whatever > > they like with the work without any permission from the other authors, > > etc. > > Think of this, if you pay $1,000,000 to the OpenGroup, you can purchase > the source to DCE/DFS and do whatever the hell you want with it. This is a license, not a transfer of copyright. --Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/