Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:40:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:40:48 -0400 Received: from mail.storm.ca ([209.87.239.66]:18668 "EHLO mail.storm.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:40:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3DB41338.3070502@storm.ca> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:46:16 -0700 From: Sandy Harris User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mitsuru KANDA CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, cryptoapi-devel@kerneli.org, design@lists.freeswan.org, usagi@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 873 Lines: 33 Mitsuru KANDA wrote: >Hello Linux kernel network maintainers, > >I'm a member of USAGI project. > >In IPv6 specifications, IPsec is mandatory. > >We implemented IPsec for Linux IP stack. > >At present, our implementation includes: > PF_KEY V2 interface, > Security Association Database and > Security Policy Database for whole IP versions, > IPsec for IPv6,(transport, tunnel mode), > IPsec for IPv4 (transport mode), > >Would you mind checking it ? > Is this code being checked in to the mainline kernel? Or becoming part of the CryptoAPI patch set? Bravo, in either case. How does that affect FreeS/WAN development? > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/