Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:39:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:39:39 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:59399 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:39:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:45:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: Jurriaan cc: Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Any hope of fixing shutdown power off for SMP? In-Reply-To: <20021020053702.GA3579@middle.of.nowhere> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1157 Lines: 29 On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Jurriaan wrote: > From: Bill Davidsen > Date: Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:40:22PM -0400 > > I've beaten this dead horse before, but it still irks me that Linux can't > > power down an SMP system. People claim that it can't be done safely, but > > maybe somone can reverse engineer NT if we aren't up to the job. > > > I'm trying to find out the same. So far: > > 2.5.43 will power down my smp VP6 board if I replace the BUG() calls in > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c with warnings. Somehow, the kernel doesn't > succesfully schedule itself to run on CPU 0. However, for my bios that > isn't needed. > Are you using the real-mode call? Perhaps I should try NOT doing that, and see if it solves the problem. That used to be the solution, but things change. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/