Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:36:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:36:29 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:56294 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:36:28 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:42:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: "Eric W. Biederman" cc: Larry McVoy , Richard Stallman , hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1208 Lines: 26 On 20 Oct 2002, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Using the Linux kernel as a tool to advocate only GPL'd software seems > inappropriate as those are not the aims of the kernel maintainers. If > RMS wants that he is free to fork the kernel, or write a kernel that > with a license that prohibits people from using software you don't > like. Having seen the software written by RMS, I'd say that you've missed one crucial detail: s/write/write (and find suckers who would use)/. RMS opinion might weight a lot more if he (and FSF programmers in general) were capable of writing programs without terminal bloat and without huge amount of security holes. As it is, I'm willing to give them exactly the same respect I give to other people writing code of such quality - Microsoft employees. Gates is kooky in one way, Stallman - in another, but both can't write decent software, both are utterly devoid of taste and both profess "features over fixing bugs" beliefs. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/