Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753578Ab3IWXSI (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:18:08 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56750 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752901Ab3IWXSH (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:18:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:18:05 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Wanpeng Li Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, rientjes@google.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] mm/vmalloc: don't set area->caller twice Message-Id: <20130923161805.4b4b570241224b673e5c3b1b@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <5237946f.4815440a.094e.ffff8c29SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> References: <1379202342-23140-1-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5237617F.6010107@jp.fujitsu.com> <5237946f.4815440a.094e.ffff8c29SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1579 Lines: 42 On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:29:41 +0800 Wanpeng Li wrote: > >> to set it again in __vmalloc_area_node. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei > >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li > >> --- > >> mm/vmalloc.c | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > >> index 1074543..d78d117 100644 > >> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > >> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > >> @@ -1566,7 +1566,6 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask, > >> pages = kmalloc_node(array_size, nested_gfp, node); > >> } > >> area->pages = pages; > >> - area->caller = caller; > >> if (!area->pages) { > >> remove_vm_area(area->addr); > >> kfree(area); > > > >Then, __vmalloc_area_node() no longer need "caller" argument. It can use area->caller instead. > > > > Thanks for pointing out, I will update it in next version. I've seen so many versions of this patchset that my head has spun right off. I'm not at all confident that I have the latest version and I'm certainly not confident that I've kept up with the ack/nack trail. So I think I'll drop everything and will await that "next version". Please be careful to Cc everyone who was involved and that the acked/reviewed-by paperwork is up to date. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/