Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753232Ab3IXBLJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:11:09 -0400 Received: from LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.111]:46414 "EHLO LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752583Ab3IXBLI (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:11:08 -0400 X-AuditID: 9c93016f-b7bc8ae000004e6e-2c-5240e6aa14f5 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:11:34 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: Weijie Yang Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bob.liu@oracle.com, weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, d.j.shin@samsung.com, heesub.shin@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, hau.chen@samsung.com, bifeng.tong@samsung.com, rui.xie@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/zswap bugfix: memory leaks and other problems Message-ID: <20130924011134.GI17725@bbox> References: <000001ceb835$f0899910$d19ccb30$%yang@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001ceb835$f0899910$d19ccb30$%yang@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2371 Lines: 66 On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:19:36PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote: > This patch series fix a few bugs in mm/zswap based on Linux-3.11. > > v2 --> v3 > - keep GFP_KERNEL flag Why do you drop this? It's plain BUG. I read Bob's reply but it couldn't justify to let the pain remain. First of all, let's fix it and better idea could come later. > > v1 --> v2 > - free memory in zswap_frontswap_invalidate_area(in patch 1) > - fix whitespace corruption (line wrapping) > > Corresponding mail thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/18/59 > > These issues fixed/optimized are: > > 1. memory leaks when re-swapon > > 2. memory leaks when invalidate and reclaim occur concurrently > > 3. avoid unnecessary page scanning > > > Issues discussed in that mail thread NOT fixed as it happens rarely or > not a big problem or controversial: > > 1. a "theoretical race condition" when reclaim page > When a handle alloced from zbud, zbud considers this handle is used > validly by upper(zswap) and can be a candidate for reclaim. But zswap has > to initialize it such as setting swapentry and adding it to rbtree. > so there is a race condition, such as: > thread 0: obtain handle x from zbud_alloc > thread 1: zbud_reclaim_page is called > thread 1: callback zswap_writeback_entry to reclaim handle x > thread 1: get swpentry from handle x (it is random value now) > thread 1: bad thing may happen > thread 0: initialize handle x with swapentry > > 2. frontswap_map bitmap not cleared after zswap reclaim > Frontswap uses frontswap_map bitmap to track page in "backend" implementation, > when zswap reclaim a page, the corresponding bitmap record is not cleared. > > 3. the potential that zswap store and reclaim functions called recursively > > > mm/zswap.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/