Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751134Ab3IXHzZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 03:55:25 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:59954 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750725Ab3IXHzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 03:55:23 -0400 Message-ID: <5241454E.2050602@collabora.co.uk> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:54:54 +0200 From: Javier Martinez Canillas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130704 Icedove/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sricharan R CC: Tony Lindgren , Santosh Shilimkar , Kevin Hilman , Linus Walleij , Stephen Warren , Lars Poeschel , Grant Likely , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Pawel Moll , Tomasz Figa , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Balaji T K , Jon Hunter , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] gpio/omap: auto-setup a GPIO when used as an IRQ References: <1379860848-29020-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20130923164519.GF2684@atomide.com> <524073BC.9080907@collabora.co.uk> <20130923170724.GG2684@atomide.com> <524141A6.2090701@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <524141A6.2090701@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2696 Lines: 80 On 09/24/2013 09:39 AM, Sricharan R wrote: > Hi, > On Monday 23 September 2013 10:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Javier Martinez Canillas [130923 10:09]: >>> On 09/23/2013 06:45 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>> Hmm does this still work for legacy platform data based >>>> drivers that are doing gpio_request() first? >>>> >>> Yes it still work when booting using board files. I tested on my OMAP3 board and >>> it worked in both DT and legacy booting mode. >> OK great. >> >>>> And what's the path for clearing things for PM when free_irq() >>>> gets called? It seems that this would leave the GPIO bank >>>> enabled causing a PM regression? >>>> >>> Indeed, I did set bank->mod_usage |= 1 << offset so the bank is enabled if the >>> device goes to suspended and then resumed but I completely forget about the >>> clearing path when the IRQ is freed. >>> >>> Which makes me think that we should probably maintain two usage variables, one >>> for GPIO and another one for IRQ and check both of them on the suspend/resume pm >>> functions. >> Yes that it seems that they should be treated separately. > To understand, why cant the flag be cleared in gpio_irq_shutdown ? Hi Sricharan, Without this patch today drivers do this: gpio_request(gpio, "foo IRQ"); // bank->mod_usage |= 1 << offset gpio_direction_input(gpio); and then request a IRQ with: irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio); request_irq(irq, ...); later on its cleanup path: free_irq(irq, dev); gpio_free(gpio) // bank->mod_usage &= ~(1 << offset); So if you clear the flag on gpio_irq_shutdown then bank module won't be enabled after a suspend making drivers using the GPIO after freeing the IRQ to fail. So the idea is to have something like this: a) Drivers that request both the GPIO and IRQ gpio_request(gpio, "foo IRQ"); // bank->mod_usage |= 1 << offset gpio_direction_input(gpio); irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio); request_irq(irq, ...); // bank->irq_usage |= 1 << offset free_irq(irq, dev); // bank->irq_usage &= ~(1 << offset); gpio_free(gpio) // bank->mod_usage &= ~(1 << offset); b) Drivers that just request the IRQ: irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio); request_irq(irq, ...); // bank->irq_usage |= 1 << offset free_irq(irq, dev); // bank->irq_usage &= ~(1 << offset); So irq_usage or mod_usage is set means that the bank has to be enabled and if both are not set means that the bank module can be disabled. > > Regards, > Sricharan > Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/