Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:25:05 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the
 net-next tree
Message-ID: <20130924102505.GS7660@secunet.com>
References: <20130924121629.f818475ddf308b0494cfce2a@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <20130924121629.f818475ddf308b0494cfce2a@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 749
Lines: 20

Hi Stephen.

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:16:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got a conflict in
> include/net/xfrm.h between commit d511337a1eda ("xfrm.h: Remove extern
> from function prototypes") from the net-next tree and commit aba826958830
> ("{ipv4,xfrm}: Introduce xfrm_tunnel_notifier for xfrm tunnel mode
> callback") from the ipsec-next tree.
> 

Thanks for the information, I'll do a rebase of the ipsec-next
tree tomorrow.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/