Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753887Ab3IXPoK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:44:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:42755 "EHLO mail-pd0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753411Ab3IXPoH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:44:07 -0400 Message-ID: <5241B32E.3090803@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:43:42 +0800 From: Zhang Yanfei User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120607 Thunderbird/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Zhang Yanfei , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , lenb@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , mingo@elte.hu, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Toshi Kani , Wanpeng Li , Thomas Renninger , Yinghai Lu , Jiang Liu , Wen Congyang , Lai Jiangshan , isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, Rik van Riel , jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, "x86@kernel.org" , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux MM , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, imtangchen@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mem-hotplug: Introduce movablenode boot option References: <524162DA.30004@cn.fujitsu.com> <5241655E.1000007@cn.fujitsu.com> <20130924124121.GG2366@htj.dyndns.org> <5241944B.4050103@gmail.com> <5241AEC0.6040505@gmail.com> <20130924153259.GM2366@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130924153259.GM2366@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1083 Lines: 28 On 09/24/2013 11:32 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:24:48PM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: >> I am now preparing the v5 version. Only in this patch we haven't come to an >> agreement. So as for the boot option name, after my explanation, do you still >> have the objection? Or you could suggest a good name for us, that'll be >> very thankful:) > > No particular idea and my concern about the name isn't very strong. > It just doesn't seem like a good name to me. It's a bit obscure and > we may want to do more things for hotplug later which may not fit the > param name. If you guys think it's good enough, please go ahead. > Thanks very much! I have addressed your comments and finish the v5 version. Please help checking them again after I send them to the community. Thanks. -- Thanks. Zhang Yanfei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/