Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754826Ab3IXWWd (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:22:33 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0180.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.180]:36089 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754630Ab3IXWWb (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:22:31 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:2909:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3 X-HE-Tag: sheep09_329388baf343d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2399 Message-ID: <1380061346.17366.1.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] intel: Remove extern from function prototypes From: Joe Perches To: Jeff Kirsher Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Jesse Brandeburg , Bruce Allan , Carolyn Wyborny , Don Skidmore , Greg Rose , Peter P Waskiewicz Jr , Alex Duyck , John Ronciak , Tushar Dave , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:22:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1380060449.2189.6.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> References: <5ccc921af41a862fe969809228f029035f851502.1380056108.git.joe@perches.com> <1380060449.2189.6.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1238 Lines: 32 On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 15:07 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 14:09 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > There are a mix of function prototypes with and without extern > > in the kernel sources. Standardize on not using extern for > > function prototypes. > > > > Function prototypes don't need to be written with extern. > > extern is assumed by the compiler. Its use is as unnecessary as > > using auto to declare automatic/local variables in a block. > > So you are able to confirm that all compilers make this assumption > correctly? The initial reason for using extern was because not all > compilers made the assumption or made it correctly. No, I didn't bother. Any current compilers already do make this assumption valid as it's been part of the c spec since 1989 and prototypes without extern already are the predominate form in .h files for linux kernel sources. Even in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/... there are more prototypes without extern than with extern. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/