Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757504Ab3IYAvF (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:51:05 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39397 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756417Ab3IYATu (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:19:50 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta , Jiang Liu , Minchan Kim Subject: [ 008/117] zram: dont grab mutex in zram_slot_free_noity Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:17:54 -0700 Message-Id: <20130925001741.773160209@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.4.3.gca3854a In-Reply-To: <20130925001740.833541979@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20130925001740.833541979@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-5.1.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5923 Lines: 205 3.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Minchan Kim commit a0c516cbfc7452c8cbd564525fef66d9f20b46d1 upstream. [1] introduced down_write in zram_slot_free_notify to prevent race between zram_slot_free_notify and zram_bvec_[read|write]. The race could happen if somebody who has right permission to open swap device is reading swap device while it is used by swap in parallel. However, zram_slot_free_notify is called with holding spin_lock of swap layer so we shouldn't avoid holing mutex. Otherwise, lockdep warns it. This patch adds new list to handle free slot and workqueue so zram_slot_free_notify just registers slot index to be freed and registers the request to workqueue. If workqueue is expired, it holds mutex_lock so there is no problem any more. If any I/O is issued, zram handles pending slot-free request caused by zram_slot_free_notify right before handling issued request because workqueue wouldn't be expired yet so zram I/O request handling function can miss it. Lastly, when zram is reset, flush_work could handle all of pending free request so we shouldn't have memory leak. NOTE: If zram_slot_free_notify's kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC would be failed, the slot will be freed when next write I/O write the slot. [1] [57ab0485, zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page() in swap free notify path] * from v2 * refactoring * from v1 * totally redesign Cc: Nitin Gupta Cc: Jiang Liu Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h | 10 ++++++ 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c +++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c @@ -445,6 +445,14 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram * goto out; } + /* + * zram_slot_free_notify could miss free so that let's + * double check. + */ + if (unlikely(meta->table[index].handle || + zram_test_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_ZERO))) + zram_free_page(zram, index); + ret = lzo1x_1_compress(uncmem, PAGE_SIZE, src, &clen, meta->compress_workmem); @@ -504,6 +512,20 @@ out: return ret; } +static void handle_pending_slot_free(struct zram *zram) +{ + struct zram_slot_free *free_rq; + + spin_lock(&zram->slot_free_lock); + while (zram->slot_free_rq) { + free_rq = zram->slot_free_rq; + zram->slot_free_rq = free_rq->next; + zram_free_page(zram, free_rq->index); + kfree(free_rq); + } + spin_unlock(&zram->slot_free_lock); +} + static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index, int offset, struct bio *bio, int rw) { @@ -511,10 +533,12 @@ static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zra if (rw == READ) { down_read(&zram->lock); + handle_pending_slot_free(zram); ret = zram_bvec_read(zram, bvec, index, offset, bio); up_read(&zram->lock); } else { down_write(&zram->lock); + handle_pending_slot_free(zram); ret = zram_bvec_write(zram, bvec, index, offset); up_write(&zram->lock); } @@ -527,6 +551,8 @@ static void zram_reset_device(struct zra size_t index; struct zram_meta *meta; + flush_work(&zram->free_work); + down_write(&zram->init_lock); if (!zram->init_done) { up_write(&zram->init_lock); @@ -721,16 +747,40 @@ error: bio_io_error(bio); } +static void zram_slot_free(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct zram *zram; + + zram = container_of(work, struct zram, free_work); + down_write(&zram->lock); + handle_pending_slot_free(zram); + up_write(&zram->lock); +} + +static void add_slot_free(struct zram *zram, struct zram_slot_free *free_rq) +{ + spin_lock(&zram->slot_free_lock); + free_rq->next = zram->slot_free_rq; + zram->slot_free_rq = free_rq; + spin_unlock(&zram->slot_free_lock); +} + static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned long index) { struct zram *zram; + struct zram_slot_free *free_rq; zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; - down_write(&zram->lock); - zram_free_page(zram, index); - up_write(&zram->lock); atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free); + + free_rq = kmalloc(sizeof(struct zram_slot_free), GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!free_rq) + return; + + free_rq->index = index; + add_slot_free(zram, free_rq); + schedule_work(&zram->free_work); } static const struct block_device_operations zram_devops = { @@ -777,6 +827,10 @@ static int create_device(struct zram *zr init_rwsem(&zram->lock); init_rwsem(&zram->init_lock); + INIT_WORK(&zram->free_work, zram_slot_free); + spin_lock_init(&zram->slot_free_lock); + zram->slot_free_rq = NULL; + zram->queue = blk_alloc_queue(GFP_KERNEL); if (!zram->queue) { pr_err("Error allocating disk queue for device %d\n", --- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h +++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h @@ -94,11 +94,20 @@ struct zram_meta { struct zs_pool *mem_pool; }; +struct zram_slot_free { + unsigned long index; + struct zram_slot_free *next; +}; + struct zram { struct zram_meta *meta; struct rw_semaphore lock; /* protect compression buffers, table, * 32bit stat counters against concurrent * notifications, reads and writes */ + + struct work_struct free_work; /* handle pending free request */ + struct zram_slot_free *slot_free_rq; /* list head of free request */ + struct request_queue *queue; struct gendisk *disk; int init_done; @@ -109,6 +118,7 @@ struct zram { * we can store in a disk. */ u64 disksize; /* bytes */ + spinlock_t slot_free_lock; struct zram_stats stats; }; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/