Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753045Ab3IYQ76 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:59:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f48.google.com ([209.85.160.48]:53857 "EHLO mail-pb0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752768Ab3IYQ75 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:59:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130925183632.08a0d073@rechenknecht2k7> References: <20130830124622.5f81b7d4@rechenknecht2k7> <20130830154205.GA1411@kroah.com> <20130925183632.08a0d073@rechenknecht2k7> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:59:56 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] add exFAT driver From: Anca Emanuel To: Benjamin Valentin Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , STAGING SUBSYSTEM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1036 Lines: 25 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Benjamin Valentin wrote: > Am Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:42:05 -0700 > schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman : > >> For staging drivers I need a maintainer that is going to take the time >> to shephard it into the core kernel tree. See other TODO files for >> how that person is defined. Are you going to be willing to do this? > > I can see what I can do. > > I've cleaned up the code a bit, especially where it would redefine > kernel functions. [1] Should I submit the end result, one file per > patch, or begin with the original code and submit patches on top of > that? For staging code: 1. It must pass compile. 2. you have an TODO file with things to do to clean it up to the standard quality of the kernel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/