Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:05:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:05:52 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:37812 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:05:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPMI driver for Linux, version 7 From: Alan Cox To: Corey Minyard Cc: Adrian Bunk , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <3DB31A8E.7060103@mvista.com> References: <3DB31A8E.7060103@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 21 Oct 2002 16:27:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1035214060.28189.163.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1039 Lines: 23 On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 22:05, Corey Minyard wrote: > >Am I right that this makes it impossible to include an IPMI driver into > >the kernel (this isn't GPL-compatible)? > > > I do not read it so, but perhaps you are right. I will ask. I'm sure I > will receive a resounding "maybe" as the answer. I was working with > people at Intel on this, and they had another driver they wanted to use > for IPMI, and wanted to push it into the kernel, but it had some > problems so I wrote this as a replacement. So I don't think Intel sees > it this way (at least those at Intel I was working with). > > -Corey Intel tend to see everything Intel's way. Perhaps someone from Intel could clarify this situation - on list ? I'd hate us to have to have an IPMI driver that US citizens couldnt use - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/