Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:23:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:23:24 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:39604 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:23:23 -0400 Subject: Re: What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2??? From: Alan Cox To: clemens@dwf.com Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200210151849.g9FInbur002088@orion.dwf.com> References: <200210151849.g9FInbur002088@orion.dwf.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 21 Oct 2002 16:45:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1035215108.27259.165.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 696 Lines: 19 On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 19:49, clemens@dwf.com wrote: > The subject just about says it. > What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with > the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases > (in particular RH8.0) 2.4.18/19/20.. are fine. 2.2 isnt really tested. > The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches, > and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their > own config file (sigh). Works for everyone else 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/