Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261440AbSJUPwK>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:52:10 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261442AbSJUPwJ>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:52:09 -0400
Received: from bernstein.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.86.52]:6023 "EHLO
	bernstein.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261440AbSJUPwF>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:52:05 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:58:11 +0100 (BST)
From: Alastair Stevens <alastair.stevens@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: alastair@gerber
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please don't call it 3.0!!
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0210211655490.1377-100000@gerber>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 904
Lines: 19

I have to agree - besides, I actually think 2.6 sounds _cooler_. It
implies a more refined, developed and enhanced version of the current
kernel (which it is!), rather than a new and untested thing. There's so
much suspicion of "dot-oh's" these days, and some of the major features
for 2.6 didn't make it in this round, so indeed, no justification for
3.0....

Cheers
Alastair                            .-=-.
__________________________________,'     `.
                                           \   www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk
Alastair Stevens, Systems Management Team   \       01223 330383
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge UK         `=.......................

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/