Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:39:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:39:06 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:53428 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:39:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:07:58 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: Alan Cox Cc: john stultz , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] compile fix for dmi_scan.c in 2.4.bk-current In-Reply-To: <1035215203.28189.167.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 829 Lines: 25 On 21 Oct 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 20:03, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > I'll remove the dmi update from Alan for 2.4.20-pre. > > > > Thats a 2.4.21-pre thing. > > Its very much a 2.4.20 thing. Its just that it accidentally acquired the > HP entry as well which we dont want. > > Lose the problem function and the HP specific quirk and you'll get the > bits that actually do matter I merged the HP Pavilion quirks on my tree and then backed it all out later because I thought the changes were not necessary for 2.4.20. Which issues the DMI update is addressing? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/