Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752096Ab3IZFG3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:06:29 -0400 Received: from ch1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.182]:23499 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750795Ab3IZFG1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:06:27 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -5 X-BigFish: VS-5(zzbb2dI98dI9371I936eI1453Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2dh2a8h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1f5fh1fe8h1ff5h209eh1155h) Message-ID: <5243C0D1.4070808@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:06:25 +0800 From: Hongbo Zhang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Gibson CC: Scott Wood , Stephen Warren , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] DMA: Freescale: Add new 8-channel DMA engine device tree nodes References: <1379499333-4745-1-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@freescale.com> <1379499333-4745-3-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@freescale.com> <524074A7.7000001@wwwdotorg.org> <524169E3.7030408@freescale.com> <5241CC60.5070204@wwwdotorg.org> <52429252.10009@freescale.com> <1380159992.24959.248.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <20130926022859.GL9625@voom.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130926022859.GL9625@voom.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1369 Lines: 28 On 09/26/2013 10:28 AM, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:46:32PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 15:35 +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote: >>> By the way, I know maybe it is difficult, but why not introduce a >>> document of maintaining rules for the dt binding docs? we have dedicated >>> maintainers for this part now. Description language from one submitter >>> cannot satisfy every reviewer/maintainer, for a reg property, is it >>> necessary to say "offset and length", >> Don't say "offset and length". It's both redundant with the base >> definition of the reg property, and overly specific because it makes >> assumptions about how the parent node's ranges are set up (sometimes we >> want to be that specific, but usually not). Thanks for your answer Scott. In fact my questions are mainly sample questions to file the necessary rules of dt binding. > To look at it another way, the format of the 'reg' property is defined > by the parent bus's binding, not the binding of the node itself. > Whatever the rule is, if it is reasonable and accepted, just as I said, we need to file it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/