Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:00:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:00:56 -0400 Received: from quark.didntduck.org ([216.43.55.190]:11016 "EHLO quark.didntduck.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:00:56 -0400 Message-ID: <3DB4341F.20109@didntduck.org> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:06:39 -0400 From: Brian Gerst User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Nakajima, Jun" CC: Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Mallick, Asit K" , "Saxena, Sunil" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixes for building kernel using Intel compiler References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 535 Lines: 15 Nakajima, Jun wrote: > I think it depends on the assumptions for the compiler quality. If you don't > trust __attribute__ ((align(xxx)), many other things are broken as well. Why > do you need to check this particular one, especially? Because the hardware requires it. -- Brain Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/