Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:33:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:33:31 -0400 Received: from sproxy.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:40122 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:33:30 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021021192410.00b4ffb8@pop.gmx.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:36:36 +0200 To: Thomas Molina From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20021020192952.00b95e80@pop.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1245 Lines: 36 At 01:58 PM 10/20/2002 -0500, Thomas Molina wrote: >On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > At 08:17 AM 10/20/2002 -0500, Thomas Molina wrote: > > >On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > > I hadn't had time to build/test kernels since 2.5.8-pre3. I now > find that > > > > loadlin doesn't work on my box any more. Is this a known > problem? If so, > > > > when did it quit working? (loadlin obsolete? other?) > > > > > >I'm carrying an open problem report from Rene Blokland on this issue. > > >What version of the kernel did you try? > > > > Only 2.5.42.virgin, 2.5.42-mm, 2.5.43-mm and 2.5.44.virgin. Binary search > > pending. > >The report stated the problem was noted with 2.5.4x. One of the >developers might want to speak up as to whether finding the exact point of >breakage is useful. 2.5.32 is the breakage point here. I hope someone _else_ can salvage loadlin :) (lions and tigers and bears - oh my GDT!) -Dorothy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/