Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:46:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:46:50 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:30133 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:46:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] compile fix for dmi_scan.c in 2.4.bk-current From: Alan Cox To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: john stultz , lkml In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 21 Oct 2002 19:07:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1035223656.27259.230.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 17 On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 17:07, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Lose the problem function and the HP specific quirk and you'll get the > > bits that actually do matter > > I merged the HP Pavilion quirks on my tree and then backed it all out > later because I thought the changes were not necessary for 2.4.20. > > Which issues the DMI update is addressing? The stuff I sent you included a pile of correctness fixes for the DMI code that are in dmidecode and came from the lm-sensors folk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/