Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:55:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:55:24 -0400 Received: from mimas.island.net ([199.60.19.4]:50448 "EHLO mimas.island.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:55:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:01:26 -0700 (PDT) From: andy barlak Reply-To: To: Mike Anderson cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error device offline fix In-Reply-To: <20021021193335.GE1069@beaverton.ibm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1196 Lines: 52 Sorry, used the wrong dmesg file for the copy and paste of the error message. yes the printk error message issued is: scsi: Device offlined - not ready or command retry failed after error recovery: host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 over and over through all ids, existing or not. Patch was successfully applied to 2.5.44. On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Mike Anderson wrote: > andy barlak [andyb@island.net] wrote: > > > > This patch to scsi_error.c make no improvement > > in my BusLogic 958 difficulties. Still get these messages > > and timouts with the patch. > > > > scsi_eh_offline_sdevs: Device offlined - not ready or command retry failed after > > error recovery: host 0 channel 0 id 1 lun 0 > > . > > . > > . > > > > -- > > > > Andy Barlak > > Is the patch applied correctly? > > I the patch the printk is changed to "scsi:" instead of > "scsi_eh_offline_sdevs:" > > -andmike > -- > Michael Anderson > andmike@us.ibm.com > -- Andy Barlak - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/