Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:38:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:38:32 -0400 Received: from ip008.siteplanet.com.br ([200.245.54.8]:3346 "EHLO plutao.siteplanet.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:38:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.0] Fixed kernel stuff From: Fernando Alencar =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=F3stica?= To: David Weinehall Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20021015211103.GV26715@khan.acc.umu.se> References: <1034548634.543.1.camel@nitrogenium> <20021014220527.GU26715@khan.acc.umu.se> <1034708558.427.0.camel@nitrogenium> <20021015211103.GV26715@khan.acc.umu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 21 Oct 2002 17:49:04 -0200 Message-Id: <1035229745.625.0.camel@nitrogenium> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1950 Lines: 55 > Since you are doing changes to the VM, I would like detail descriptions > of what each change does, and why it is necessary, stability- or > security-wise. I will not accept changes to the VM subsystem unless > there is a valid reason; let the early v2.4-series be witness to why > this is a good stance. David, I've must install Linux on AMD386 DX40, HD Maxtor 160MB, 8MB RAM for this task i used kernel 2.0.39. When I compiled kernel 2.0.39, I noticed some `warnings` which I corrected as mentioned previously. Then I inspected the VM subsystem code, where found any stuff that could be cleanup and improved, such as: +#define clear_page(page) memset((void *)(page), 0, PAGE_SIZE) +#define copy_page(to,from) memcpy((void *)(to), (void *)(from), PAGE_SIZE) > Speedups are generally not counted as a valid reason, unless we're > talking a change in the order of a magnitude or more. Code cleanup > might be a good reason, but then I'll merge it into the 2.0.41-tree > instead; this will probably be the case for your lxdialog-fixes, since > I'm cleaning up that code anyway for 2.0.41. LOL! The main reason this patch is cleanup and better code standartize. I think thats code cleanup is good reason too! > Regards: David Weinehall > -- > /> David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander <\ > // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // > \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ Have fun! -- Fernando Alencar Mar?stica Graduate Student, Computer Science Linux Register User Id #281457 University Methodist of Piracicaba Departament of Computer Science home: http://www.unimep.br/~famarost - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/