Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:46:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:46:14 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:16391 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:46:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related) To: kas@informatics.muni.cz (Jan Kasprzak) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:46:45 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), reiser@namesys.com (Hans Reiser), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20010202173644.A12520@informatics.muni.cz> from "Jan Kasprzak" at Feb 02, 2001 05:36:44 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > : It is the original one. I'll try with the -69: > : > With 2.96-69 the reiserfs seems to work well. > Sorry for the confusion, I forgot to upgrade the gcc on my machine. Excellent. Im just glad to know its a fixed bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/