Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753991Ab3I0Qct (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:32:49 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:47004 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753918Ab3I0Qcr (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:32:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:32:42 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Vivien Didelot Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: (at24) move header to linux/platform_data/ Message-ID: <20130927163242.GB3094@katana> References: <169123028.921974.1377290733515.JavaMail.root@mail> <1414767040.1054326.1380226152008.JavaMail.root@mail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1414767040.1054326.1380226152008.JavaMail.root@mail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2357 Lines: 63 --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:09:12PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > Hi Wolfram, >=20 > > Wolfram wrote: > >=20 > > > > IMHO it makes sense. Why wouldn't we want all platform_data in > > > > include/linux/platform_data/? > > >=20 > > > For the same reason we don't want all driver source files in one > > > directory? It's a mess. > >=20 > > Well, that's different. Not all drivers expose platform data, but > > many subsystems have drivers with platform data. A common include > > directory for the *_platform_data structure definitions makes sense. >=20 > Also IMO having such header file in include/linux/i2c/ for a driver > declared in drivers/misc/eeprom/ is not very consistent. > So this is the purpose of this include directory. What do you think? Well, yes, I will apply it if you could rebase it onto v3.12-rc2. I am unsure about the platform_data dir in general, though. For example, I'd prefer to have the i2c-* files in the i2c-dir, but this is another question. Thanks, Wolfram --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSRbMqAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2moAP/RGKnijixsOQcvVnXc/JfH6h XZzn98hoRxTKAPeGzN7bXqdvtWMjgsIhHo0QSk/EtTKlXmXWKKEIJeH3/8Ukdksc +f9yC09sjZLmkf1q3XsjfX9Sy92DqYF8Q7jtDRk0lSWLJjR5JYlbZRobQNRlXGUF XLI9BzIj1709vnwyIw8u2HexnsXdzuv6fHlbqsr8Q+hwAVv8VLxRpQ4oXdUhayI/ yo3avlK4PBBsCYYyb7MGztxJu2f4IMM0NjugKhCrQbaEtoUBt+t/MuESGQvHxJOV GiXM5N93iqC8uDVuQ2ToCrVnF5YJnTQO6x6y8qqccqHbpLPW8z2zG8B/YdCNYS2t tmFw86slTnQGuVumvz7RA7bbXZwaQHwTArYAjYIKDo1eVp4N33Mg0C8inWE98RHF Un0W9EYMwuMLBSb4BTzvBr5jW/jeZe1QXsYabty5IFBdd680TOxVNMvv2rWIl0tL xctXoaM9ZT/FeRDW9C8QWPATOhYk/uhx1WzHjTXvEOwpOPAwAkDC5my3xguK1uFA MJXncYysSSlA8g8sH6/0oLb4GurW1ywFq94y9OkrjLDDpJxtQzdB3TqPOvrVAmzM qy47t2/5bYTAorqj+U5WEXiLEVqI6UFSn+jqS54C3QzFR/M3tQjZPslpXNoYilDc Cre+bI8LStPv7By6uZYu =DxcC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/