Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753674Ab3I0RKg (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:10:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f175.google.com ([209.85.128.175]:48432 "EHLO mail-ve0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752921Ab3I0RKc (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:10:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1380270519.27811.10.camel@pasglop> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:10:32 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: guuk5loXAQmdsBY7yDUQQCtdIjE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please revert 928bea964827d7824b548c1f8e06eccbbc4d0d7d From: Linus Torvalds To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , linuxppc-dev , Linux Kernel list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 728 Lines: 20 On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > So i would like to use the first way that you suggest : call pci_set_master > PCIe port driver. So I have to say, that if we can fix this with just adding a single new pci_set_master() call, we should do that before we decide to revert. If other, bigger issues then come up, we can decide to revert. But if there's a one-liner fix, let's just do that first, ok? Mind sending a patch? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/