Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:38:52 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, axboe@kernel.dk,
        linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
Message-ID: <20130927183851.GA16605@redhat.com>
References: <1375912471-5106-1-git-send-email-kmo@daterainc.com>
 <20130808150954.GA30092@infradead.org>
 <20130808211529.GB15409@kmo-pixel>
 <20130924110012.GA7160@infradead.org>
 <20130924132014.GA16165@redhat.com>
 <20130924191954.GB2636@kmo-pixel>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130924191954.GB2636@kmo-pixel>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2107
Lines: 54

On Tue, Sep 24 2013 at  3:19pm -0400,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:20:14AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24 2013 at  7:00am -0400,
> > Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Just curious, what's the state of the remaining immutable bio work?
> > 
> > Hey Christoph,
> > 
> > Have you been over the patchset?  Looks sane to you?
> > 
> > Given how disruptive this patchset is to the block layer I'm wondering
> > how painful this change will be in combination with Jens' blk-mq
> > changes.  I'd prefer to see blk-mq before immutable biovecs; but I have
> > my own selfish reasons for that.
> > 
> > I'm also concerned about DM regressions given that a lot of DM code to
> > handle splitting a bio that spans target boundaries is ripped out, see:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2840657/
> 
> Oh good, you had seen that :)
> 
> Are you worried about performance regressions or actual bugs?

Actual bugs.
 
> I _have_ explicitly tested that code path, but I don't know what corner
> cases I may have missed so it definitely needs your eyeballs and testing
> too.
>
> As for performance - this'll be more efficient than what the dm code was
> doing before. Especially when the multipage bvec patches go in.

Sure, I can appreciate that.
 
> > But that is just handwaving/FUD at this point cause I haven't put the
> > time to looking at this patchset close enough to feel comfortable.  I
> > can make reviewing this patchset a priority this week though.
> > 
> > Kent, have you rebased this patchset at all?  Do you have a git tree I
> > can clone to save the pain of pulling these patches out my my mbox,
> > etc.
> 
> Yeah: git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git for-jens

Looking now, will build and kickoff some regression tests before I then
jump into reviewing the code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/