Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:03:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:03:06 -0400 Received: from deimos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]:25285 "EHLO deimos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:03:06 -0400 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15796.38594.516266.130894@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:07:30 -0700 To: Erich Focht Cc: David Mosberger , Matthew Dobson , "linux-ia64" , "linux-kernel" Subject: Re: [PATCH] topology for ia64 In-Reply-To: <200210051904.22480.efocht@ess.nec.de> References: <200210051904.22480.efocht@ess.nec.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 756 Lines: 17 >>>>> On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 19:04:22 +0200, Erich Focht said: Erich> Hi David, please find attached a first attempt to implement Erich> the topology.h macros/routines for IA64. We need this for the Erich> NUMA scheduler setup. Why does the cpu_to_node_map[] exist for non-NUMA configurations? It seems to me that it would be better to make cpu_to_node_map a macro that uses an array-check for NUMA configurations and a simple test against phys_cpu_present_map() for non-NUMA. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/