Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753939Ab3I1No5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Sep 2013 09:44:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:45284 "EHLO mail-ee0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753498Ab3I1Nox (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Sep 2013 09:44:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:44:49 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Borislav Petkov Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huawei.libin@huawei.com, wangyijing@huawei.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, guohanjun@huawei.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Message-ID: <20130928134449.GB26931@gmail.com> References: <20130925100722.GB3433@nazgul.tnic> <20130925182936.GD16693@gmail.com> <20130926231545.GD10123@pd.tnic> <20130927065115.GA6852@gmail.com> <20130927103802.GA4422@pd.tnic> <20130927143249.GD4422@pd.tnic> <20130927143554.GF4422@pd.tnic> <20130928082542.GA18198@gmail.com> <20130928102305.GA5956@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130928102305.GA5956@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2401 Lines: 56 * Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Could we, with another add-on patch, further compress the first half > > of the output as well? > > > > Advanced output like this would be really cool: > > Sure. > > > > [ 0.074509] x86: Booting node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 > > > [ 0.644008] x86: Booting node #1, CPUs: #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 > > > [ 1.245006] x86: Booting node #2, CPUs: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 > > > [ 1.864005] x86: Booting node #3, CPUs: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 > > > [ 2.489005] x86: Booting node #4, CPUs: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 > > > [ 3.093005] x86: Booting node #5, CPUs: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 > > > [ 3.698005] x86: Booting node #6, CPUs: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 > > > [ 4.304005] x86: Booting node #7, CPUs: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 > > > [ 4.961413] x86: Booted up 8 nodes, 64 CPUs > > Boot(ing|ed) kinda wastes unnecessary space too, how about we go a step > further: > > [ 0.074509] x86: Booting SMP configuration: > [ 0.644008] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 > [ 1.245006] .... node #1, CPUs: #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 > [ 1.864005] .... node #2, CPUs: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 > [ 2.489005] .... node #3, CPUs: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 > [ 3.093005] .... node #4, CPUs: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 > [ 3.698005] .... node #5, CPUs: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 > [ 4.304005] .... node #6, CPUs: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 > [ 4.961413] .... node #7, CPUs: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 > [ 5.245021] x86: Booted up 8 nodes, 64 CPUs > > > [ 0.074509] x86: Booting SMP configuration: > [ 0.072367] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 > [ 0.686329] x86: Booted up 1 node, 8 CPUs Nice! > Btw, the "x86" prefix would mean we want to either change pr_fmt() of > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c (which I rather not) or not use pr_info (which > I'd prefer). Not using pr_info() for such specially formatted output is fine I think. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/