Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:06:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:06:47 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:65428 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:06:46 -0400 From: Richard Stallman To: yakker@aparity.com CC: portnoy@tellink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: (yakker@aparity.com) Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new Reply-to: rms@gnu.org References: Message-Id: Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:12:53 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 27 Nobody's evil or stupid or naive just because they make a certain licensing choice. It is a stretch to conclude anything about the general attitude or character of a person from one action, so I would not say the people who distribute non-free software are "evil people" in a general sense. I will say they have done one thing that is evil: distributing a non-free program. Non-free software licenses are designed to divide and dominate the users, denying them the basic freedoms for software users. That's what makes them non-free, and that is what makes it wrong. Non-free software is a social problem, one that we need to solve if computer users are to have freedom. There are many different ways people make money; some are ethical while others involve mistreating others. If we accept "making a living" as a valid excuse to mistreat people, we will be mistreated constantly. There comes a time when we have to say that we are not impressed by the argument that "We need to do this to people in order to make a living." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/