Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:58:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:58:37 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:11786 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:58:36 -0400 Subject: Re: Son of crunch time: the list v1.2. From: Robert Love To: landley@trommello.org Cc: george@mvista.net, georgeanz@users.sourceforge.net, Jeff Garzik , Guillaume Boissiere , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200210211900.42772.landley@trommello.org> References: <20021021135137.2801edd2.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200210211642.10435.landley@trommello.org> <1035256849.1044.3.camel@phantasy> <200210211900.42772.landley@trommello.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 22 Oct 2002 01:04:21 -0400 Message-Id: <1035263062.1044.7.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 800 Lines: 25 On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 20:00, Rob Landley wrote: > Anybody know if he made this change? I don't think so. Its an implementation detail that can be worked out after the freeze, anyhow. > Any comments on which of these three patches Linus should > personally have the opportunity to turn down after the 27th? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers I do not think Linus should have the opportunity to turn down any of these patches. Only one of them has been sent to him, the high-res-timers, and I think he should merge it. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/