Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:48:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:48:20 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:44270 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:48:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3DB4F5EC.EE8B20FC@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:53:32 -0700 From: george anzinger Organization: Monta Vista Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20b i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: landley@trommello.org CC: Robert Love , george@mvista.net, georgeanz@users.sourceforge.net, Jeff Garzik , Guillaume Boissiere , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Son of crunch time: the list v1.2. References: <20021021135137.2801edd2.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200210211642.10435.landley@trommello.org> <1035256849.1044.3.camel@phantasy> <200210211900.42772.landley@trommello.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1569 Lines: 47 Rob Landley wrote: > > On Monday 21 October 2002 22:20, Robert Love wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 17:42, Rob Landley wrote: > > > George said he would change the code to meet Linus's issues (re the sub > > jiffies stuff). But there was not much debate either way, and I suspect > > George may in fact be correct. > > Anybody know if he made this change? Uh, what I will offer is: 1.) Posix clock & timers NOT HIGH RES 2.) A three patch set to put in high-res-timers: a.) The core kernel timer.c stuff b.) The i386 high res stuff c.) A patch to increase the POSIX clocks & timers to high res. > > > George also offered an interface-only version of the patch that > > implements the POSIX clocks and timers syscalls, without the high > > resolution support, so it would be nice to at the very least merge the > > missing POSIX functionality. > > > > Robert Love > > Any comments on which of these three patches Linus should personally have the > opportunity to turn down after the 27th? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers None of them :) I will post a new set against the latest kernel. Working.... -g -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/