Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 05:40:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 05:40:57 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:50696 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 05:40:56 -0400 Message-ID: <3DB51EA2.5060106@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 05:47:14 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Dillow CC: Christopher Keller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 3COM 3C990 NIC References: <1035002976.3086.4.camel@maranello.interclypse.net> <3DB4D9F8.F86ABA4@y12.doe.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 799 Lines: 24 David Dillow wrote: > I have a completely reworked version that I expect to be able to release RSN. > (I know, I know, some of you have heard that before... it just takes time to > get people around here to sign off on these things. :/) > > It will support zero-copy TCP, TCP segmentation offload, and when DaveM's > IPSEC is in, I'll be able to do hardware offload for that as well. Cool :) Will you be submitting this for inclusion in the kernel? And, what differences exists between the 3c59x and 3c90x hardware, and 3c990? Just IPSEC? JEff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/